The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

The Defendants are professors of E University in the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea.

On December 12, 2016, the Defendants heard that the former president F, who was dismissed on December 15:30, 2016, would be present at the meeting of the school affairs committee, and entered the 15 faculty members of E University including the Defendants, and the 2nd floor conference of the school affairs committee to prevent them.

The Defendants, despite the fact that 15 members of the school affairs committee, including the victim G, who is the president’s occupational performance, were holding a meeting at that place, are illegal and invalid.

(d) the resignation of a teaching staff member; fins without such sealings; fins without her head; fins must be teaching staff members.

Non-qualified teaching staff members were dismissed. They are not qualified as teaching staff members.

The members of the school affairs committee occupied the meeting room for about 30 minutes, such as "the members of the school affairs committee illegally occupied the meeting room," and refusing to comply with the repeated request for withdrawal from the victim G, etc., and prevented the disturbance from proceeding with the meeting of the school affairs committee.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the meetings of the school affairs committee of the victims by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H in part;

1. Each investigation report (for a time, 18, 20, 24);

1. Submission of documentary evidence and photographs of the complainants [the defendants and their defense counsel] are non-protective business at the meeting of the school affairs committee of this case, and the defendants did not exercise any power to control the victims' intentions, and there was no intention to interfere with the business.

However, the following circumstances that can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, the meeting of the school affairs committee of this case was a regular meeting of the school affairs committee members, and there was a problem of the status of some directors among the school affairs committee members.

and to protect the school affairs committee present.