A. The sentence of the lower court (the imprisonment for six months, the suspension of the execution of two years, the order to attend a law enforcement lecture 80 hours, the community service order 200 hours) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. According to the arguments and records of the instant case, the lower court appears to have been reasonably determined by fully considering various sentencing grounds asserted by the Defendant and the Prosecutor, and there is no special circumstance to ex post facto change the sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.