The defendant's assertion that the defendant's punishment is unfair on the grounds that the defendant's punishment is less than 1/3 of the minimum limit of punishment, although the defendant's entire confessions the crime, even though the amount of fraud in this case is considerably high, the damage recovery is not possible, the defendant's history of punishment has already been punished for fraud, there is no change of circumstances that can be considered in sentencing after the judgment of the court below, the defendant's punishment is recommended within the scope of punishment, and the records and arguments are not excessive, considering the following circumstances: the sum of the amount of profit from 1 to 4 years [Adjustment of the scope of punishment] as a result of 1 to 4 years [Adjustment of the scope of punishment], the sum of the amount of profit from 1 to 4 years, and the amount of profit from 8 to 4 years.

Therefore, the appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (It is not binding upon the court by taking into account the fact that the health of the defendant is not good).