The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a car B.

On July 12, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 06:30 on July 12, 2018, and tried to turn to the left from the c apartment on the side of the valley box while driving at a 248-lane of the lotia Sari-ro 248.

At that time, the intersection is an intersection and traffic signal is installed, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely proceed in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant got the front part of the E-city bus driven by D, which was driven by D in accordance with the new subparagraph, due to the negligence of left-hand turn on the red signal, and was driven by the Defendant as the front part of the above vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim F, who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, about 12 weeks of T 12 weeks of math to the victim F, such as the math of T3, and the injury to the right guest, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the same victim G (V, 56 years of age), such as the opening of the right guest, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the same victim H (30 years of age), the damage to the fresh of the fresh and the fresh of the fresh that requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the same victim I (56 years of age), and the injury to the fresh of the fresh and tension that require approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the same victim, respectively, and the injury to the fresh that requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the same victim L (25 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing of selective imprisonment without prison labor;

A. favorable conditions: the first offender, the Defendant, recognizing the instant crime, thereby making his mistake.