사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment of 10 months, by imprisonment of 8 months, and by a fine of 2,00,000 won, respectively.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and Defendant B are gathered to operate a speculative game room from May 31, 2013 to divide the profits therefrom. From July 22:30, 2013 to July 22:30, 2013, Defendant B has established 30 game equipment of “S heading office and heading office,” which is a speculative electronic recreation device purchased by Defendant B, in the game room of “G” which is located under the FM building 101 at military time. Defendant A takes charge of the operation of the above game room, Defendant B provides merchandise coupons to use for exchanging points, and Defendant C employed as an employee provided the above game room with merchandise coupons to use for exchanging points in the above game room, and the search of the above game room is carried out by an unspecified number of customers for accumulation of cash in the user box in the above game room (200 points per 10,000 points per 20 points per 10,000 points per 20 points per 200 points) so that customers lose or lose the game merchandise in the previous game store.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to engage in speculative activities as a business.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure and the list of seizure;
1. Defendants of the relevant criminal facts: Article 30(1)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc.; Article 30 of the Criminal Act
1. Defendant A and B who choose the punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor; and
1. Defendant C at a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant A and B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant A and B of the community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant A: Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant C of the provisional payment order: The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Defendant A and B, etc. are not significant.