If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 21:00 on November 19, 201, the Defendant was assaulted by F in the “E” of the 1112 Report of the D’s 112 Report, and assaulted by H, police officer, police officer, police officer, and police officer to arrest a flagrant offender against F due to the charge of causing property damage, etc., and assaulted F at one time by taking custody of the J’s order. On the same day, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the J, etc.’s performance of official duties and transferred him to the G police office, and thereby interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by assaulting him, such as being arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the J, etc.’s performance of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness J or I's testimony;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the results of video viewing;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines;

1. Detention in Nowon-gu: A witness who is guilty of Article 70 and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Code clearly testified to the extent of damage, the witness I testified to have been present, and the witness I testified to have been present, and the defendant's face is confirmed in video.