2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

On May 29, 2016, the Defendant and C met with food at the “F” restaurant operated by the victim E in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, on May 29, 2016, on the ground that it was difficult for the above restaurant employees to string the string to smoke tobacco.

For this reason, the Defendant and C are victims, for this reason, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am, I am am, I am am, I am am, I am am, I am am, I am am, I am, I am, I am am, I am am, I am am, I am am on several occasions, and I am am am on, I am.;

The Defendant blicked the time when writing in the invoice flick, and the Defendant blicked to 20:00 the hours of restaurant operation up to 22:00, by exercising power over about one hour and 40 minutes by gathering the blick click click, etc. if he wanted to get off the flick click click click click click, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C to interfere with the operation of the restaurant by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the investigation report (the CCTV images and audio-recording files submitted by the victim), CCTV photographs and investigation reports (referring to the witness G) by the suspect at the time;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 314(1) and 310 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the content and degree of verbal abuse committed by the Defendant and C, and the time and degree of interference with the victim’s business, etc. are not less liability, and the fact that the victim’s damage has not been recovered is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, food ordered by the defendant, which is against the defendant, and the side of the restaurant of this case.