For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the ground that the charge of violation of the Road Traffic Act (the measures not taken after the accident) among the facts charged in the instant case constituted a case where there is no evidence of crime.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but the guilty part does not state the reason in the petition of appeal and does not state the reason for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.