beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.07.20 2016나39358

사해행위취소

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of the judgment is as follows: (a) the 4th class 4th class of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as the 2nd class; and (b) the 6th class 4th class through 10th class of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the 6th class 4th class 6th class to

2. According to the evidence examined above, Gap evidence Nos. 3-1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 5; Eul evidence Nos. 5; Eul's order to submit financial transaction information to our bank; the result of this court's order to submit financial transaction information; and all pleadings, the establishment registration of a neighboring mortgage in the name of our bank as to the real estate of this case was cancelled on April 30, 2014 after the registration of ownership transfer was made in the name of the defendant; the market price around December 29, 2015 was 342,61,200 won; and it is confirmed that the same amount was the same at the time of the closing of argument in the first instance court; thus, the joint collateral value of the real estate of this case is 197,626,757 won (=342,661,200 won; 20,034,434,1250,000 won, and 297,000 won, respectively, 297.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.