1. On February 13, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 07:45 on February 13, 2019, up to 110 rooms of “D” located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul, “D”; (b) on the grounds that the victim B (the age of 27) who worked as an employee could not be known after leaving the victim’s room; and (c) on the part of the Defendant, the Defendant laid the victim’s left side and continued face.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. At around 07:50 on February 13, 2019, the victim E (the age of 27) who worked at the main point of “D” located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as an employee, entered the room No. 110, and the victim E (the age of 27) was found to have his head by gathering plastic ice, which is a dangerous object on the table, for the reason that it cannot be known, (a) the victim’s head was 20cm, 17cm, 4cm thick, and 4cm thick), and the victim was her head by taking care of the victim’s escape from the outside.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement prepared B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Attachment of ice photographs), investigation report (Hearing of the F phone statement of a witness), investigation report (to hear report on the victim B phone statement), investigation report (to submit and report materials used for violence), victim E-mail and ice photographic;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of special violence) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes is deemed to have committed an assault against the victims without good cause, and one of them at the price of head with dangerous articles.

However, there was no agreement such as receiving a letter from the victims.

In addition, the defendant is identical in the past several times.