소유권보존등기말소등기절차이행 등
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The facts subsequent to the facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged in light of the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 7 and 11.
In the Land Survey Book drawn up in the Japanese colonial Period, E with the domicile in G, which is <1,584, the G, the G, the G, the G, the H, the H, the H, the 3,004 level, and the G, the G, the 2,306 level prior to G, the G, the G, the G, the G, and the G, the G, the G, the G, the G, the G, the G, the G, the G, the G, the G, the G, the G, the G, the G.
B. The land listed in the separate list Nos. 1 was divided from the above land, and the Defendant Republic of Korea completed the registration of ownership preservation on September 4, 1992. ② The land was changed to the land listed in the separate list Nos. 3 and its category and unit, and Defendant Republic of Korea completed the registration of ownership preservation on June 14, 1984. ③ After the Defendant Foundation completed the registration of ownership preservation on December 29, 2003, the land was divided into the land listed in the same list Nos. 4 from the land, and the ownership was transferred to Defendant B on December 29, 2003, and again Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer on February 2, 2004. ④ After the division of the land listed in the same list Nos. 2 from the land, Defendant Republic of Korea completed the registration of ownership preservation on September 2, 1992. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 181000, Nov. 12, 2003>
C. The Plaintiff’s attached E, together with J and K, had a domicile in G and G, which is the form of punishment D, but was divided into G in 1917, and M was succeeded to the wife M on September 15, 1969, and M was deceased on September 15, 1969, and the Plaintiff inherited it.
2. Determination:
A. In light of the following facts: (i) Determination on each real estate listed in the [Attachment 1] Nos. 1 and 3 as to each real estate listed in the [Attachment 3], and the names of E as indicated in the land research register for each land listed in the [Attachment 1 and 3] are the same to one person; (ii) the division of the Plaintiff’s fleets coincide with the former address; and (iii) the name of E is the same to the former address and the name of the person responsible for the assessment; and (iv) there is no circumstance to