beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.05.13 2019고단722

모욕

Text

Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of facts charged

1. At around 15:10:45 on February 15, 2019, the Defendant found the victim B who entered in the name of the head of the management office in the Gyeonggi-gu Dang-gu Dang-si Dang-si Office, and publicly insulting the victim B despite D, who is an employee of the management office.

2. Defendant B, at the above date and at the above place, abused the victim’s desire to insult himself as seen above, and assaulted the victim A’s face, such as “I am her her hye,” and her head her hye, and her head her hye in double hand, and leading him out of the management office.

2. Determination

A. Defendant A1’s complaint subject to prosecution: Article 312(1) and Article 311(2) of the Criminal Act (see Articles 31(1) and 311(2) of the Criminal Act), which submitted a written agreement to the effect that the victim withdraws the complaint after the prosecution of the instant case: Subparagraph 5 of Article

B. Defendant B (1) The crime of non-prosecution of intention: Article 260(1) and (3)2 of the Criminal Act provides a written agreement to the effect that the victim does not want the punishment after the prosecution is instituted: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act