A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

1. The above defendant's assertion that the defendants' act and role of the defendants B and the progress of the crime of this case are nothing more than aiding and abetting crimes is difficult to accept.

On April 2012, the Defendants conspiredd Defendant B to take money and valuables from the victims on the ground of Defendant B’s witnessing to reclaim waste concrete, construction waste, which is a construction waste, at the construction site of H company located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and in the construction site of the said construction waste reclamation.

Defendant

A around May 2012, around the construction site of the victim, at the site of the above company's name and the site of the above company operated by the victim, "the above company buried construction waste at the construction site of this location." The ground refers to "Pari", and the defendant B notified the defendant A of the accurate location of the waste buried by telephone, and eventually carried out the above wastes.

After that, around July 2012, the Defendants agreed to receive KRW 20 million from the victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's side at the H company's site office located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and reported that the victim's victim's waste was buried at the construction site of H company's company. The victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim'

Defendant

A received 20 million won in cash from a food victim who is frighten at the same place, and divided A into KRW 15 million, KRW 2 million, and KRW 3 million, respectively.

As a result, the Defendants jointly received the property by threatening the victim.

2. Defendant A.