However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 28, 2017, at around 00:37, the Defendant destroyed the “D” main points operated by the Victim C in Kimhae-si B by means of unloading the entrance door, a total of 700,000 won of the market price of the victim’s ownership, from an Aluminum field, which is a dangerous object, on the ground that the employees’ attitude was not in mind.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 369 of the Criminal Act and Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act (Punishment of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Persons who are subject to special sentencing guidelines from April to August 1 to June 2, such as damage of special property, etc., whose sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the observation of and order to attend lectures, or the provision of community service order, is based on aggravating the basic aggravation of the classification of types: The amount of punishment recommended for mitigation (unlimited to punishment): The amount of general sentencing in the mitigation area (from April to October): The amount of punishment sentenced to imprisonment for up to eight months: Imprisonment for a period of suspension of execution of six months: the amount of imprisonment for a period of two years; the surveillance of protection; the amount of 40 hours for taking lectures; the amount of aggravated punishment for up to 80 hours: A period of imprisonment for a period of two months: A period of suspension of execution of sentence for a period of 6 months; a period of cumulative punishment (including a period of