However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

[2017 Senior 1968] The Defendant is the representative director of D, which is an insurance agency, and the victim E served as an employee belonging to the said company from November 2015 to January 2016.

1. According to the introduction of the victim, the Defendant had the intent to use it as evidentiary materials in claiming damages against the victim when the insurance designer employed by the employee of the above company as an employee of the victim, in order to use it as evidentiary materials, for the purpose of using it as a fraudulent debt authentication in the victim’s name.

A. Accordingly, the Defendant, at the above D office located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on December 30, 2015, issued the victim’s seal impression and a certificate of seal impression on the ground that it is necessary for the company’s business affairs, and without authority, issued the victim’s seal impression to the victim’s name, and without authority to exercise the certificate, will repay the amount of KRW 50,000,000 to July 10, 2016 by using the computer.

(The Cash has been received directly) and written out and printed out a document stating “E” in the confirmation column, and then arbitrarily affixed the victim’s seal impression on the name next thereto.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant forged a letter of confirmation under the victim's name, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. At the above time and place, the Defendant arbitrarily sealed the victim’s seal impression in the blank proxy form to the effect that the Defendant, without authority, delegated the preparation of a fair certificate of monetary consumption and lending contract without authority for the purpose of exercising the right.

In addition, the Defendant, on the ground that the insurance designer employed by the introduction of the victim, caused the damage to the company due to the insurance designer, conducted false debt authentication equivalent to KRW 10 million in the name of the victim, and had the victim perform compulsory execution on the ground thereof. In the above D office around March 18, 2016, the Defendant “A” and the amount of debt in the consignment column of the letter of delegation.