However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a C-si engineer.

피고인은 2014. 12. 3. 02:00경 인천시 부평구 산곡동 소재 백운현대아파트 307동 앞 노상 위 택시 내에서 손님으로 승차한 피해자 D가 하차 시 두고 내린 시가 150만 원 상당 삼성노트북(모델명: XQ700T1C-H53S, 제조번호: E) 1대가 든 가방을 습득한 승객인 성명불상자로부터 인계받아 위 가방을 보관하던 중 자신이 가질 목적으로 가지고 가 이를 횡령하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Written statements of D;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of Theft No. Round Photographss);

1. Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) inasmuch as the crime is not good in that the defendant, who had been subject to punishment twice for the same crime, once again taken over from the customer, he/she embezzled so far as he/she had been subject to punishment; (b) however, inasmuch as the crime is not good, he/she will choose imprisonment; (c) however, he/she will be entrusted with the goods left by the victim; (d) the above goods have been temporarily returned to the victim; (e) the disabled person's delay is against his/her mistake; and (e) other circumstances revealed in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character