When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business with the trade name of "B".

No person shall arrange, solicit, induce, or compel an unspecified person to engage in sexual intercourse or sexual traffic, such as sexual intercourse or similar acts, in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables, or other property benefits.

Nevertheless, at around 18:00 on November 17, 2017, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts by means of the same method, such as officetels 417 and 101, from the male grandchildren, who suffered from KRW 1.30,000 to KRW 2.60,00 in the name of the price for commercial sex acts, and employed in advance, after receiving from the male grandchildren, the name of contact with the advertisements posted on the Internet site, such as “D,” etc., as the price for commercial sex acts. In addition, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts by means of the same method as the above business from August 1, 2017 to December 1, 2017, including officetels 417 and 101.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of F or E;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Site advertising and site photographs;

1. A investigation report (a conversation between the head of the B business office and the head of the business office);

1. Confirmation of the control details of business establishments B on November 17, 2017;

1. The original copy of his/her mobile phone screen;

1. Application of this Act to output of on-site photographs, and printing of the advertising screen;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 and Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense (Concurrent punishment of imprisonment and penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic;

1. The Defendant started the business of arranging sexual traffic by taking advantage of the fact that the Defendant’s relative with the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though having been aware of the fact that the Defendant’s relative with the Defendant, started the business of arranging sexual traffic. On November 17, 2017, the Defendant’s business was around November 17, 2017.