2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized his/her crime and reflected his/her crime is favorable to the defendant.

However, in full view of the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for a crime related to the same type of larceny, the fact that the crime is considerably poor, such as the defendant's breathing of the victim's vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and leaving the scene without taking any measures after causing the traffic accident, the fact that no damage has been restored to the damaged vehicle due to the traffic accident, and other various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, environment and sexual conduct, it is difficult to see that the sentencing of the court below is too excessive and unfair, and the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da36442, Apr. 2, 200).