If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 24, 2015, the defendant will work for the victim D as a multilateral employee with a 2,300,000 won in advance.

“The Court made an order.”

However, even if the defendant received the advance payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to work as an employee.

On September 25, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2.3 million from the victim to the Busan Bank account under the name of the Defendant on September 25, 2015, and acquired KRW 2.5 million in cash from the end of September of the same year.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each investigation report (victim D phone investigation);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a report of investigation (for the date and time of crime);

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.