1. Examining the reasoning for the Defendant’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of violating the Trademark Act by online advertising among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the trademark law, or by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation

2. On the grounds of the prosecutor’s appeal, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of a crime regarding the violation of the Trademark Act by the internal indication of the crew’s driving school among the facts charged in the instant

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.