건물인도
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) deliver the real estate listed in the annex;
B. From May 15, 2014, the above A
subsection (b).
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On May 13, 2009, a lessee, a Korean Land Trust Co., Ltd., and a real estate sub-lease business, etc., concluded a lease contract with the following details. < Amended by Act No. 9473, May 13, 2009>
1) Lease object: Real estate listed in the separate sheet in the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 101 Dong, 102 Dong (hereinafter “instant real estate”).
) Lease period of 52 households, officetels 13 households: lease deposit from May 13, 2009 to May 12, 2012: 500,000,000 won for apartments 4): KRW 48,000 for apartments 52 households (not value-added tax) and officetels 10,000 for officetels 13 households (excluding value-added tax).
B. On December 23, 2011, the Plaintiff acquired the registration of ownership transfer from the Korea Land Trust Co., Ltd. for the instant real estate, and entered into a lease agreement with the Pakistan Industry on May 11, 2012, as follows.
1) Lease object: Lease deposit between May 13, 2012 and May 12, 2014: 1,500,000,000 won for each apartment unit (excluding value-added tax), 5,000,000 won for each household unit (excluding value-added tax), and 11 households for officetels (excluding value-added tax).
C. On July 2, 2013, the Plaintiff revised the terms and conditions of the said lease agreement with the Pacific Industries as follows.
1) Lease period: 2) Lease deposit from the first lease date to May 14, 2014 under an initial lease agreement: 900,000,000 won (existing payment)
D. On March 21, 2014, the so-called “surining industry” sub-leases the instant real estate to the Defendant for the period from May 5, 2014 to May 5, 2015, with a deposit of KRW 30,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 2,000,000, and the re-lease period.
E. In March 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Pacific Industries with the following content.
1) The strike waives the claim for the return of the lease deposit under the above lease agreement. 2) The Plaintiff waived the strike industry pursuant to paragraph 1.