도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The Defendant appealed on the ground that the sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, three years of probation, three years of probation order, and 40 hours of order to attend a compliance driving lecture) is too unreasonable. However, in light of the various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, including the fact that the Defendant again committed the instant drinking driving crime despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished seven times of imprisonment with prison labor, including the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three times due to the crime of drinking driving, and that the blood alcohol concentration measured by the Defendant at the time of the instant case is relatively high, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant for the reasons indicated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.
Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.