beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.29 2017구합696

산재보험료 및 고용보험료 부과처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On June 10, 2009, the Plaintiff obtained a building permit for B-owned houses of 165.92 square meters in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-do (the scheduled date of commencement of construction works, June 19, 2009), and completed the construction work on December 31, 2010 (hereinafter “instant construction work”).

(A) On December 13, 201, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) decided to establish an employment mountain re-insurance (the date the insurance is completed: June 19, 2009; the date the insurance is completed; December 31, 2010; the date the insurance premium is finalized; December 14, 201; and the Plaintiff was notified on December 14, 201. < Amended by Act No. 11087, Dec. 14, 2011; Act No. 1097, Jun. 19, 2009; Act No. 10372, Dec. 31, 2010; Act No. 10855, Dec. 14, 2011>

(A) On January 3, 2012, the Intervenor imposed a disposition of imposition of KRW 1,381,810 of the industrial accident compensation insurance premium, KRW 461,580 of the employment insurance premium, and KRW 461,580 of the insurance premium (hereinafter “each of the instant insurance premium”) with respect to the instant construction project (Evidence 10), and on April 24, 2014, the Defendant urged the Plaintiff to pay each of the following amounts (each of the instant insurance premium - the amount paid in advance by the Plaintiff) on April 24, 2014, the total amount of KRW 461,580 of the employment insurance premium calculated on the basis of the unpaid payment of each of the instant insurance premium, 461,420 won, KRW 147,600, KRW 327,760 of the employment insurance premium, KRW 1,381,81, KRW 480,570 of the industrial accident compensation insurance premium, KRW 481,301,40

On May 8, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a civil petition document (hereinafter referred to as “instant civil petition document”) stating that “The instant reminder disposition was delayed in the process of employee retirement, and thus, the revocation thereof would be sought (Evidence A 3).” On May 16, 2014, the Defendant issued the instant reminder order to the Plaintiff by receiving the collection transfer of each insurance premium from the Plaintiff, and the matters concerning the first imposition (additional charge) of each insurance premium.