The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant charges on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of the

In examining the record, the lower court did not err by infringing the Defendant’s right of defense, as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

The assertion that the investigation procedure is unlawful is only asserted in the final appeal that the defendant did not regard it as the grounds for appeal or that the court below did not consider it as the subject of judgment ex officio, and it cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.