성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of all the circumstances, including the following: (a) the nature of the instant crime is not good and the Defendant has been punished several times as other crimes; and (b) the sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of suspended execution, etc. in one year and six months of imprisonment) is too uneasible and unfair.
2. The crime of this case is not good in light of the size of a sexual traffic business establishment of this case, the period of business, profits accrued therefrom, etc., and the defendant committed the crime of this case of this case even though he had been punished several times due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act. However, even though the defendant committed the crime of this case of this case, he committed the crime of this case. However, considering the following as a whole, the defendant's failure to commit a crime of this case against his mistake and does not repeat the crime of this case, the defendant discontinued the entertainment drinking house business and lives faithfully in his workplace, and has no criminal record of the same kind, and all kinds of sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, the prosecutor's assertion is without
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.