A. The Plaintiff paid to the Defendant totaling KRW 28,025,00,000 from June 17, 2008 to November 30, 2009 as set forth in the table 1, and repaid the amount exceeding KRW 20,000 to the Defendant as set forth in the instant notarial deed.

Therefore, since the defendant's claim against the plaintiff in accordance with the notarial deed of this case has expired all, compulsory execution based on the notarial deed of this case is not allowed.

The plaintiff asserted that on June 17, 200 1, 200 1,440,00 on June 17, 2008 2, 200 670,00 on June 17, 2008 3, 200 670,000 on July 15, 2008 70,005 July 15, 2008 670,000 on July 16, 2008 that the plaintiff paid 70,000 won to the defendant on July 16, 2008. However, according to each of the statements in Gap evidence 17, Eul evidence 2 and Eul evidence, the plaintiff's payment to the defendant on July 16, 2008 can be recognized as 670,000 won on July 16, 208, "the above amount is 70,000 won" and "the above 700,700 won".

6 2008. 8. 11. 500,000 7 2008. 8. 19. 670,000 8 2008. 8. 19. 440,000 9 2008. 8. 19. 1,170,000 10 2008. 8. 21. 500,000 11 2008. 8. 25. 500,000 12 2008. 9. 11. 1,000,000 13 2008. 10. 20. 670,000 14 2008. 10. 20. 770,000 15 2008. 11. 13. 400,000 16 2008. 12. 16. 770,000 17 2009. 2. 20. 1,000,000 18 2009. 2. 25. 150,000 19 2009. 2. 26. 1,000,000 20 2009. 3. 11. 400,000 21 2009. 3. 31. 2,235,000 22 2009년 6월경 670,000 D까페 23 2009년 6월경 670,000 D까페 24 2009. 9. 17. 670,000 E 계좌에서 입금 25 2009. 9. 18. 670,000 F 계좌에서 입금 26 2009년 9월경 670,000 G 27 2009년 9월경 670,000 G 28 2009. 10. 30. 2,880,000 H 계좌에서 입금 29 2009년 10월경 3,500,000 E(I) 30 2009. 11. 24. 770,000 E 계좌에서 입금 31 2009. 11. 30. 460,000 J 계좌에서 입금 합계 28,025,000

B. The plaintiff joined two units in the limit of KRW 10,00,000 operated by the defendant, on July 15, 2008, and on May 19, 2009 (excluding one unit in which the plaintiff received the guidance money on January 19, 2009), as shown in the above table 1.