손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. In the case of a tort cited in the judgment of the court of first instance, the existence of an intentional harmful act based on the intentional negligence and the burden of proving the causation between the act and the occurrence of the damage exists on the part of the claimant. The reasons why the court's explanation in this case is based on the evidence submitted by the plaintiff to the court of first instance, which is insufficient to recognize the fact that the defendants embezzled with the intent of unlawful acquisition with the intent of unlawful acquisition by using the plaintiff's withdrawal of the plaintiff's money for personal purpose as asserted by the plaintiff, and the following facts are the same as the judgment of the court of first instance, except for a partial dismissal as shown below, it shall be accepted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Under the second below, the "admission fee-raising business, etc." shall be deemed "admission fee-raising business, etc.".
Part 5 of the third parallel "from February 29, 2011" shall be deemed to be "from December 28, 2011".
The 3rd page 12-13 of the agreement was concluded respectively. The agreement was concluded respectively.
The term "liability for damages" between the last 3rd and the first 4th eth eth eths shall be changed to "liability for damages."
The second sentence "136 million won" is "136.8 million won," and the third sentence "69,055,755 won" is "69,055,775 won," respectively.
Part 6-7 of the first 6-7 "Ar who performs duties" shall be "Ar who performs duties".
The 8th 5th eth eth 5th eth eth eth eth eth eth 41.
Under the 8th below, the phrase “not later than March 26, 2012” shall be read as “not later than March 16, 2012”, “216,293,050 won” as “262,693,050 won”, and the phrase “7-50 won” shall be deleted below.
Under the 9th page, “28 December 28, 2010,” the 7-6th page “2010.12.28, 2009,” and the 3rd page of the evidence No. 45 (Reasons for Non-prosecution) (“Defendant 28, 2010, Dec. 28, 2010)” also read “No. 6 of the judgment of the first instance”. < Amended by Act No. 9814, Dec. 28, 2009>