beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.09.27 2013고단2579

협박등

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The defendant in a factory laboratory is a company member, and the victim B(the age of 42) is a first marital relationship, and the victim is a married couple.

1. On May 14, 2013, the Defendant promised on May 14, 2013, the Defendant’s outer stay by the Defendant, and the victim’s workplace meeting, to satisfy one another, to satisfy one another, to satisfy one another, and to satisfy one another, and to satisfy one another, and to satisfy one with the victim under 206 Dong 105, Sungwon-gu, Sungwonwon

However, the Defendant expressed the victim’s “Chewing as I wanting to do so,” but did not have any kidnasium. The Defendant expressed two developed animals,” and expressed the victim’s left side buckbucks to the victim’s right edge, by putting the things on the funeral room located in the apartment, and the kids in the middle door, and kids in the apartment room.” The Defendant saw the victim’s flusium bucks on the part of the Defendant’s horse.

2. At around 21:30 on May 21, 2013, the Defendant was the date of the couple’s husband and wife, and the victim was found to have the same meals, but on the ground that the Defendant refused to do so, the Defendant made the phone call to the victim for the reason that he refused to do so, and “I am free to bring a divorce lawsuit, but I am am son, I am am a dead way. I am am am her in the way of the death. I would like to see that I am. I would like to am her in the way of the death, such as the breathbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbing, we would not end.” The Defendant threatened the victim, “I am am her part, as I am am son or I am am am am son,

Judgment

It is decided as per the disposition for the reason that the victim's intention to punish the victim of the crime of non-compliance with punishment is withdrawn or the rejection of the indication of non-compliance with punishment is more than the judgment (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the