However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 9, 2019, the Defendant maintained its utility by leaving the victim from locking with the back wheels, which the victim set up on the ground that the victim C did not pay the money in front of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul-si, and that the victim C did not pay the money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Inquiry into the enemy;

1. Details of payment of the cost of leasing the victim;

1. In an investigation report (as to the possession and possession of the Lao), the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the victim had no ownership and right to possess the land in this case, and that the defendant did not support the crime of causing property damage since the defendant had a legitimate title to the land in this case. The following facts and circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of this case, i.e., (i) the title of the ownership in this case E, a corporation E, the above corporation entered into a lease agreement with the F. Suchip notification point and the lease contract operated by the defendant on April 11, 2019 and delivered the leased money to the victim, and the victim was allowed to use the leased money to the victim (the testimony and investigation record No. 30 pages of the record of this case) by paying the leased money through the branch to which the victim was affiliated, and (ii) the victim did not obtain the victim's consent from June 201 to June 1, 2019.