However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a cargo driver who drives B 4.5 tons of cargo vehicles owned by the Defendant.

The defendant illegally parked the above 4.5 tons of cargo vehicles on the roads located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and around August 29, 2020, around 14:57, the defendant was found to have illegal parking from the Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City D and the public official E (the age of 47), and F (the age of 50) who is a public official for the control of the violation of parking regulations under its jurisdiction, and the above public official taken photographs of the violation of parking regulations; the above public official taken photographs of the violation of parking regulations; issued a ticket for towing the violation of parking regulations and a vehicle to be towed subject to the imposition of the administrative fine; printed them; attached the above cargo onto the above cargo vehicle; and taken the luxor of lux (luxative ingredients) in custody on the cargo vehicle.

In addition, the public officials are not able to say that they are able to say that they are able to do so.

It is Donman Don Don Don-do up to Gun Jin Jin Jin-do.

“Ch.” L. H. H. H. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L

in the state of loss “(D)”

I will thrown away.

“Along with sound, the victims threatened the victims as if they were incompetence.”

As such, the Defendant, by carrying dangerous objects and threatening the said public officials, interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the crackdown on the violation of parking regulations of the said public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement E or F, the scene of each police's statement, records of seizure, such as seized articles, and requests for appraisal of the list of seized articles;

1. Article 144 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor as provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment with prison labor for one month to seven years;

2. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria [the types of decisions] that interfere with the execution of official duties.