If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is engaged in the duty of driving CM3 automobiles.

On October 7, 2013, around 10:59, the Defendant proceeded along the intersection at the entrance of Taepo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si along the two-lanes from the right side to the right side of the breadth.

At the same time, the signal was installed, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to safely drive the signal and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the damage to left by the negligence of operating straightly in contravention of the signal, and the victim D(43 years of age) who makes the finish left-hand turn from the front side of the EF line driving from the front side of the defendant's vehicle.

As such, the victim suffered from the victim's negligence in the course of the above business to the left-hand fat, which requires treatment for about two weeks, and the victim's fat G (n, 38 years of age) suffered from the victim's injury to the fater G (n, 66 years of age), the victim's injury to the fatum fat, etc. for about two weeks, the injury to the fatum fat, etc. for about two weeks to the same H (n, 67 years of age), the injury to the fatum fat, etc. for about two weeks to the same J (n, 30 years of age), the injury to the fatum fat, etc. for about two weeks to the same K (n, 54 years of age), the injury to the fater's fatum fatum fat, etc. for about two weeks, and the injury to the same L (n, 30 years of age) for about two weeks to the same M (2 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness N or D;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;

1. CCTV photographs;

1. Each medical certificate and each statement of opinion;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel alleged that there was no violation of the signal as stated in the Defendant’s criminal facts, such as investigation report (signal frequency), traffic signal control card, signal cycle photograph, investigation report (CCTV analysis), CCTV analysis photograph, and CCTV analysis photograph, but according to each evidence of the judgment, the Defendant sent a signal.