However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant, the representative of D, was the victim C's land, and the victim knew that he sold the above company to E and purchased the company's factory site as the company's factory site, and he sold the above company's site to E, the above company and sold a lot of marginal profits.

Therefore, the Defendant, even after having lawfully obtained the authorization and permission of the establishment of a factory from the Pocheon Viewing Service Company D, provided false information to the G company H reporters known to the general public as if they were illegally approved and approved, and had the G company H reporters informed of the fact that they received the authorization, permission, etc. from the Pocheon Viewing Service, and had the Defendant receive money by threatening the victims

Around April 2008, the Defendant informed G Company H reporters of the fact that “A company obtained the authorization and permission for illegal establishment, etc. of a factory from Flcheon-si, Flcheon-si, the area where D was publicly announced of the restriction on factory location for the prevention of environmental pollution by paying the street expenses to D, and that the above newspaper articles with the above contents would soon be the press of the victim through K and L president of K and L who was in charge of the authorization and permission for the establishment of a new factory.

On April 18, 2008, the Defendant sent to the above victim a warning that “50 million won would be a problem if he had no day at any time. It will be a problem if he would not know about KRW 50 million.” On the other hand, the Defendant, through O, a corporation, D staff, in the NM located in Scheon-si M, Ma, and the Defendant, upon non-compliance with this, sent the statement to the above victim to the effect that “50 million won would be a problem if he would be known.” If he did not comply with this, the Defendant saw that the above contents of the article will be

As above, the Defendant: (a) received a total of KRW 10 million from the above victim who frighted the victim and fright thereto; (b) around April 18, 2008; (c) around June 9, 2008, KRW 10 million; and (d) around June 11, 2008, KRW 10 million from each of the above O accounts; and (e) around September 9, 2008, KRW 35 million were issued via the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Prosecution C: