2. Even if the lower court’s determination of the grounds for sentencing and obstructing the performance of official duties are considered to impede the establishment of legal order and to have a high possibility of criticism in that it impairs the authority of the public authority, the lower court’s sentencing is determined to be reasonable by fully considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant has no same criminal record, such as obstruction of performance of official duties, etc.; (b) the degree of tangible power exercised by police officers; and (c) other factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case; (b) the lower court’s determination is deemed to be reasonable by fully considering the various factors of sentencing alleged by the Prosecutor; and (c) there

Therefore, the prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.