2. The Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) is the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) A religious organization B.

A. The relationship between the parties (i) Plaintiff A Religious Organization B (hereinafter “Plaintiff Religious Group”) is a religious organization established around May 5, 1947 by taking into force the moral rules, e.g., e., e., e., the ethical rules, e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e.

Plaintiff

The name of the representative of the Religious Group is mixed with “G”, “H”, or “I” (hereinafter referred to as “H”, collectively referred to as “the beginning of the Plaintiff Religious Group”), and six members of the Plaintiff Religious Group, including the Plaintiff C, constituted the G group and represent the Plaintiff Religious Group after the death of the first class H. Among them, four members died, the current rules of the Plaintiff Religious Group’s Council Regulations and its executive rules concerning “H” of the Plaintiff Religious Group jointly with K, and H represent the principal body (the term of office of the Plaintiff Religious Group), and H presides over all domestic and foreign events and duties, and the term of office of the Plaintiff’s Do Council and the H Foundation is the same as that of the Plaintiff Religious Foundation, and the term of office of the Plaintiff’s Do Council and the H may not be infringed upon.

(Article 7 and Article 8 of the Regulations on the Implementation of the Council) is prescribed.

shall represent the end group.

B. On June 26, 1969, the end of the plaintiff Sheet set up L, an incorporated foundation, the purpose of which is the effective and appropriate management and operation of the public hearing established as the whole business of the plaintiff Sheet, E, advisory committees, advisers, standing committees, purification committee, purification committee, and the end of the plaintiff Sheet.

A board of directors, a general secretary, etc. is an institution in charge of general affairs, accounting, and compilation of budget of the Plaintiff's Order.

As seen below, the Defendant asserts that he/she was duly appointed by the 6th Integrated Council held on May 29, 2015 as the president of the Plaintiff’s Order.

B. The provisions pertaining to the appointment, dismissal, etc. of the senior secretary among the regulations related to the appointment, dismissal, etc. of the senior secretary of the Plaintiff Order, including the appointment and dismissal of the senior secretary.