If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives of the apartment housing management of C, and the Internet next car page "D is being opened and operated," the victim F is the general secretary of the C apartment unit as the attorney-general.

1. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection;

A. On February 9, 2011, the Defendant: (a) called “the question for the confirmation and collection of litigation costs according to the result of the case’s verification of the representative status” on the Kafin bulletin board of the Kafin “Public Debate”; (b) “The victim F did not first collect litigation costs against the first public trial, but first collect them to the appellate court (the second public trial). In addition, the first public trial of a certified judicial scrivener became final and conclusive even if he did not raise an objection to the full bench; (c) however, it was difficult to accept the second public trial as a final and conclusive judgment; (d) however, it is probable that the second public trial would have been accepted if there was no attendance of the said representative attorney, and it would have been more likely that it would have been accepted if he raised an objection by the former president. It would be better for the present general secretary who works as the head of the attorney-at-law, and it would be natural that he would not have any more than the second public attorney-at-law’s total revenue management (the second public trial).

However, in fact, the victim claimed and received the litigation costs of the case in the Goyang District Court 2009Gahap6769, Seoul High Court 2010Na58515, and in the process, it was denied from the president G of the apartment representative.