However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

At around 23:50 on December 20, 2014, the applicant for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") requested the mother F to pay money necessary for gambling on the Internet, but he refused to demand the mother F to pay money again, but he did not receive any money, and the applicant for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") was able to stop from the victim D, who was frightd with the fright and frighted with the fright and frighted with the fright and frighted with the fright, and expressed the attitude of the victim to keep the victim's body in the state of threat as the knick knick kn's length was 17cm, total length was 29cm.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the defendant's prosecution;

1. Statement of each police statement related to D, F and G;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to field photographs, deadly weapons photographs, and investigation reports (CCTV image review);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 2 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 283 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be made again for the reason of sentencing);

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the probation and community service order

1. The Defendant asserted that he was his father’s father “I knife I knife I knife I knife I knife I knife I knife I knife I knife I kn

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence adopted and examined by the court, the Defendant’s charges of this case are as follows.