However, with respect to Defendant A and B, respectively, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A knew that a large amount of money was deposited in the passbook of the victim H, he suggested Defendant B to open the passbook of the victim H and withdraw the deposit. Defendant B consented to this and asked Defendant C to notify the above public offering and to identify the person who will transfer the account according to the end of Defendant A, who requested to identify the person who will transfer the account. Defendant C received the passbook of the victim who stolen from Defendant A and B and received the passbook of the victim H to transfer the deposit directly to his own account.

1. On November 17, 2015, Defendant B and C committed joint crimes: (a) at the victim H’s house located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Incheon, Defendant B reported the network at the victim’s home room; and (b) while Defendant C parked the vehicle at the victim’s home room, Defendant C maintained one passbook and one seal owned by the victim in the victim’s house room.

As a result, the Defendants stolen the victim's property together with A.

2. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. As of November 17, 2015, Defendant A and Defendant B, as indicated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, read the passbook and seal of H brought to death to Defendant C, and the Defendant C, upon which it was discovered, read the amount of money by using the pen on the paper of the entry to be kept for the purpose of exercising at a point in the middle-gu Agricultural Bank located in the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Incheon, which was located, on the entry to be kept for the purpose of using the pen, on the face of “130,000,000 won” on the face page of “H”, and affix the above H’s seal obtained from Defendant B following that name.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge a chapter 1 of the pre-entry and withdrawal slip in the name of H, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. Defendant C’s use of the above investigation document is a document that duly formed the forged deposit and withdrawal slips with the NA employees who knew of such forgery at the time, place, and place indicated in the above paragraph (a).