When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car of the Pacifician.

On December 14, 2019, the Defendant driven the above car on December 21, 2019, and led the side-way of 147-2, as the Seo-gu bankruptcy, to proceed in the direction of C at the direction of the Yongsan Children Park.

Since there is a one-way passage on which no entry is marked, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well on the front side and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and not enter the station according to the traffic safety facility sign or signal direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the front part of the Plaintiff’s bicycle driving on the right side of the crosswalk installed at the intersection at the end of the road to the left side, which was driven by the Defendant, due to the negligence of driving a one-way traffic route, in violation of the safety signs indicating the prohibition of traffic.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as the left-hand majority of the 14 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. A reply to a request for appraisal by the head of the E hospital;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV photographs and CCTV video CDs at the accident site;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is deemed to have committed the crime of this case on the ground of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant suffered an injury to the victim by driving ahead of the one-way road. In light of the negligence, the degree of injury

(b).