2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

피고인은 2014. 1. 2. 12:00경 김해시 B에 있는 C의 집에 전기 공사를 해주러 갔다가 마침 피해자 D(66세)가 C에게 C의 아들 E이 피해자로부터 편취한 돈 2억 원을 돌려달라고 요구하는 것을 보고 '고모님(C) 얼굴 돌리세요, 이 새끼 오늘 죽이뿔깁니다'라고 하면서 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 수회 때리고, 발로 피해자의 다리를 수회 걷어차고, 도망가는 피해자를 쫓아 가 손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 바닥에 넘어뜨린 다음 발로 피해자를 수회 걷어차고 밟아 피해자에게 약 3주간의 치료를 요하는 무릎의 타박상 등의 상해를 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation reports (in relation to attachment of suspect D's written diagnosis of injury);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing).

3. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the Probation Criminal Act [the scope of recommending sentence] general injury (the general scope of recommending sentence] is that the defendant, who has been punished several times due to the same kind of crime, committed the crime of this case, and the victim wants to punish the defendant. In light of the fact that the defendant, who has been punished several times due to the same criminal act, committed the crime of this case, the responsibility for such crime is not easy.

However, considering favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant has mistakenly recognized and reflected the defendant, the degree of injury of the victim is not excessive, the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, the fact that the victim deposited 1.5 million won for the victim, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the circumstances before and after the crime, the character, conduct and environment of the defendant, etc., and all other circumstances which