The Defendant subscribed to several insurance policies that pay the daily amount of hospitalization stipulated in the terms and conditions of the insurance in the case of the hospital treatment, other than the hospital treatment, and, after having subscribed to several insurance policies that pay the daily amount of hospitalization stipulated in the insurance contract, the Defendant did not actually undergo hospital treatment in the name of the relevant hospital, or undergo a special inspection or treatment that actually requires hospitalization, and thus, received hospital treatment, notwithstanding the absence of the need for hospital treatment, he was able to collect the insurance money by deceiving the insurance company

After receiving hospitalized treatment for 21 days under the name of the disease, which is the upper half of the right chains, from the hospital located in Ansan-si from the around December 23, 2009 to January 12, 2010, the Defendant submitted diagnosis certificates and insurance claim forms to the victim for the victims on or around January 13, 2010, and around January 15, 2010, the victims submitted diagnosis certificates and insurance claim forms to the victims on and around January 15, 2010, and received insurance money amounting to 4,200,000 won from the victims company as the insurance money, and received from the victims company for eight times from that time, as shown in the annexed crime list, the Defendant received insurance money equivalent to KRW 27,700,446.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The first police statement concerning F;

1. The details of the sending, search, and seizure, and verification warrant and correspondence data of the victim G and three persons;

1. A copy of a medical record;

1. A copy of an application for insurance and a written request;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Evidence No. 7 pages, 254, 313, 328, 489);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (Fraud and choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the judgment of the accused and the defense counsel on the assertion of the accused and the defense counsel under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act had no intention to acquire the crime in the judgment.