When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA vehicle under his/her own possession.

On September 12:30 on September 26, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle and proceeded with approximately 30-40km in the speed, using two lanes, from the 7rd side of the front road in Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, to the 5rd side of the front road.

There is a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely proceeding in accordance with the signals, since it is a long-distance intersection where traffic is controlled by signal, etc., a person engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely proceeding in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, despite the fact that the electric signal has been changed to the stop signal, the Defendant, by negligence, by disregarding and proceeding against the signal as it is, has proceeded to the home flusing distance from the edge of the long distance from the bend intersection of the Mad-spack.

C(48) Operation D(48) was shocked by the front side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

The Defendant, by these occupational negligence, suffered salt, tensions, and tensions in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to the above C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to C by the police in the protocol; and

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes stated in the actual survey report, traffic accident occurrence report and diagnosis report;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.