However, for two years from the date of the conclusion of this judgment against the Defendants.

Where a foreigner intends to enter the Republic of Korea, he/she shall undergo an entry inspection by immigration control officials at an entry and departure port.

On October 20, 2016, the Defendants embarked on D, which is a cruise ship, at an international passenger terminal in the Hansan Port located at the top of China, on October 2016, and attempted to enter the Republic of Korea without a visa under the landing permission system for tourism as the cruise ship entered Busan port on October 10, 2016, but Defendant A of the Chinese nationality was forced to depart from the Republic of Korea due to domestic illegal stay on April 20, 2016. Defendant B of the same Chinese nationality was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on the ground that the Defendant B committed the fraudulent act in the Republic of Korea on May 26, 2009, and was forced to enter the Republic of Korea on May 26, 2009.

On October 23, 2016, at around 03:08, the Defendants conspired to enter the country without undergoing an entry inspection by immigration control officials in such a way as to combine the wire ropes prepared in advance in D, a cruise ship that was anchored in the port of Busan, which was located in the port of Busan, with the 206 Busan, on the cruise rail, and to get out of the cruise ship, and to get out of the cruise ship after getting out of the cruise ship, and to get out of the port of Busan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. An investigation report (Attachment of a report on a departure from D address), - A search report, and an investigation report (a cruise ship D specifications and landing permission system for tourism) shall apply to statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Immigration Control Act and Articles 93-3 subparagraph 1 and 12 (1) of the Immigration Control Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, each of the choice of criminal facts;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution is that the defendants conspired to enter the same as the above and the nature of the crime is not weak.

However, the defendants are against the defendants, and the age and age of the defendants.