However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 28, 201, at around 11:00 on January 28, 201, the injured Defendant retired from his company at the E-Saun Factory office operated by the Defendant located in Busan Young-gu, for the reason that the victim F (34 years of age) who is an employee was not paid monthly salary, etc., and led the injured Defendant to a climatic salt that requires approximately two weeks of treatment for the injured party by drinking and sprinking the face, neck, and body parts of the victim.

2. On April 2012, the Defendant: (a) presumed that the Victim G (the 46-year-old) was making a fraudulent gambling against the Defendant’s seat; (b) in order to comply with this, the Defendant committed a bodily injury on the part of the Busan-gu Busan-gu Busan-gu Office where the victim was bucked with H; and (c) when the Defendant spucks down the victim’s bucks due to drinking, sprinking, smuggling, etc.; and (d) when the bucks on the part of the bridge, the Defendant jointly inflicted a bodily injury on the victim by preventing the victim from leaving the entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the Defendant committed the instant crime of the same kind, even though having been sentenced several times for a crime, such as violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and there are extenuating circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that he/she again committed the instant crime of the same kind, and that he/she agreed with the victim G (in addition to the charges of innocence, submission of an agreement on August 22, 2013) and deposit KRW 1.5 million

. The above.