If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a taxi engineer, a victim C (41 years of age, female) who was on board a taxi as a guest at the end of March, 2013, and a person who has continued to be in an internal relationship after being aware of it.

At around 02:50 on January 7, 2014, the Defendant: (a) called “the victim’s cell phone (G) located in Pyeongtaek-si F 105 self-employed; (b) the victim continued to refuse to do so; (c) the victim would have known of the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’s son’s son

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A voice recording file CD;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order shows the attitude of the defendant who is divided into his own name, and Article 334(1) of the same Act provides that the amount of fine determined by the summary order shall be reduced partially by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) there is no previous department; and (b) the victim who returned to the Republic of Korea talked with telephone conversations who did not have to meet; and (c) it appears that the victim would not have reached this case by conclusive intention but by conclusive intention; and (d)