A. 1) The Plaintiff is a person engaged in the Rotterdam construction business, and the Defendant is a corporation that runs the construction business, etc. 2) The Plaintiff supplied and completed the construction work from the Defendant on August 201, 201 by receiving a supply of B Rotterdam Corporation and C Hospital Rotterdam Corporation, and the construction cost that was not paid in connection with each of the above construction works is KRW 71,027,000 in total (=B 57,959,000 in the Rotterdam Corporation and KRW 13,068,00 in the C Hospital Rotterdam Corporation).

3) In addition, around August 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) performed 103,83,458 won in total when the construction work had not been paid in connection with each of the above construction works; (b) performed 103,83,458 won in total; (c) performed 17,256,818,131 won in the D Main Office D 17,258,131 won in 58,8109 L Corporation 58,56,109 [including D 5,560,00 won in 22,19,8109]; (d) there is no ground for recognition; (e) evidence No. 1; and (e) evidence No. 2-1; and (e) statement No. 2-10,100 won in the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of determination, since the Plaintiff completed all of the above construction works contracted by the Defendant and did not receive total construction cost of KRW 174,860,458 (i.e., D 71,027,00 won and D 103,833,458 won). As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at each rate of 15% per annum as stipulated in the Commercial Act from June 2, 2012 to June 19, 2015, which is the delivery date of the complaint in this case, to the Plaintiff, after the completion date of each construction work, as the Plaintiff seeks, from June 2, 2012 to June 19, 2015.

2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.