However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, at around 21:00 on May 11, 2018, at E main points operated by the Victim D located in C, expressed a bath to customers during the mixed drinking at the E main points operated by the victim D, and booms the trial expenses, and the Defendant, “this sway year,” and “I sway,” and “I sway,” and “I sway,” and “I sway,” respectively, do so.

“The victim’s main business operation was obstructed by force for about 1 hour and 30 minutes, such as hinginging the public, avoiding the disturbance, making other customers go.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site situations, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Although the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for protection observation and community service order had been sentenced to a fine several times for the same offense, the defendant was committed with the time of committing a crime, and the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc. shall be determined as ordered by considering all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc.