However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:40 on December 26, 2017, in a “C” restaurant located in Ischeon-si B.

’ 는 신고를 받고 출동한 이천 경찰서 D 파출소 소속 경사 E에게 “ 내가 뭘 잘못했냐,

Does it become a police officer since then;

"Absent assaulted against the ship of the above E as drinking."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the Table for Reporting Processing;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommended punishment] The basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person who has been subject to special sentencing) of the category 1 (the obstruction of performance of official duties and the coercion of duties) is not [the person who has been subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence]; comprehensive consideration of favorable circumstances, such as situations having no record of committing the same kind of crime as the unfavorable circumstances, such as the circumstance that there