2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion and the grounds for the court's explanation concerning each of the above parts are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The reasons why this court should explain this part of the facts are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the same contents as stated in Section 16 (c) of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the corresponding part of the reasons for the judgment. As such, according to the result of the medical record appraisal conducted by the president of the Korean Association of Medical Doctors in the appellate trial, the appraisal of the medical record appraisal conducted by the president of the Korean Association of Medical Doctors in the appellate trial cannot be deemed to be “where the network has changed to the extent that it is difficult to adapt to the volume or time of work within one week prior to the outbreak of the disease, or 30 percent or more of the daily work, or the intensity of work, work environment, etc.” The hours of work did not exceed “60 hours per week prior to the outbreak of the disease,” and “64 hours per week average for the four weeks prior to the outbreak of the disease,” and it is difficult to acknowledge proximate causal relation between work and on the date of the outbreak of the disease.

Notice of the Ministry of Employment and Labor No. 2013-32, and matters necessary to determine whether to recognize the occupational disease of brain-cerebrovascular diseases or heart-dead diseases or cardioscular diseases; and hereinafter referred to as “instant notice”).

(b) by high blood pressure.