2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

As to this, the Plaintiff appealed only to the claim for the return of the loan against the Defendants, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the Plaintiff’s claim for the return of the loan against

2. Basic facts

A. On October 20, 2003, the Plaintiff received interest of 2% per month at Defendant C’s request, and transferred KRW 100 million to E account with Defendant C’s representative director (hereinafter “instant loan”).

B. On April 7, 2006, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendants in money borrowed. On August 15, 2006, the Defendant agreed with Defendant C to pay KRW 60 million, out of the instant loans, to KRW 30 million until August 15, 2006, and KRW 30 million until December 31, 2006, and the Plaintiff to withdraw the complaint against the said Defendant (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

Defendant C paid only KRW 23 million out of the above KRW 60 million (part of the total amount of KRW 30 million on December 31, 2006).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 8, 9 evidence, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

3. Determination

A. Defendant B and Defendant C engaged in the business of constructing and selling a new commercial building, and the Plaintiff lent the instant loan to the Defendants with the funds for the said business.

Therefore, Defendant B, jointly and severally with Defendant C, is jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff unpaid and interest or delay damages on the instant loan.

B. The borrowing of the instant loan from Defendant B is Defendant C, and Defendant B did not have any fact of working together with Defendant C.

Therefore, Defendant B raises objection to the Plaintiff.