A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for one year.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

[criminal record] On October 22, 2014, Defendant B was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for fraud in the support of Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 14, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendants A was a member of the Jongno-gu Seoul Development Association established around 2006, and was a member of the same association.

F and the partnership's business were close to F and F, and Defendant B had the vice president around 2005.

G was the opportunity to join as a member of the G and was paid by F with the knowledge of F. F. F. F. The redevelopment expert is a legal hub for F and Defendant A’s reconstruction-related legal affairs on behalf of F.

Defendant

On October 209, A and F discovered from Defendant B that “H, the president of the pertinent redevelopment association, increased the construction cost to be paid to the members of the said redevelopment association,” Defendant B filed a complaint with the head of the complaint prepared by Defendant B, and Defendant B filed a complaint with Defendant B on December 2009 to the effect that “I shall appoint an attorney-at-law who has laid off upon the death (the name of the former attorney-at-law)” from Defendant B, who was discovered through Defendant B, and then sought an attorney-at-law I discovered through Defendant B, who requested the case to act on behalf of the Plaintiff.

around September 2013, the Defendants were bound by a complicated monetary relationship between the Defendants and F as a matter of sharing various expenses incurred in the redevelopment partnership’s duties, and accordingly, filed a false complaint with F with the intent to receive money from F, using the fact that several forms of borrowings were prepared in the name of F, and accordingly, Defendant B embezzled F’s money amounting to KRW 45 million. Accordingly, Defendant B drafted a complaint to the effect that “F’s embezzlement of F’s money amounting to KRW 45 million,” and Defendant A gave this case to Defendant A around that time.